| Consultative
Conferences on APMC Model Rules January
18, 2008, New Delhi
Speech of Dr. P.K. Mishra,
Secretary to Government of India, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation Hon'ble
Union Minister of Agricultrue & Conusmer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution,
Shri Rajeev Chandrasekhar, President (Elect), FICCI, Shri P.M. Sinha, Chairman
of FICCI's Agriculture and Rural Development Committee, Dr. Amit Mitra, Secretary
General of FICCI, Distinguished participants, India is endowed with approximately
141 million hectares of arable land, all the 20 types of agro-ecological regions,
long hours of sun-shine and incredible genetic bio-diversity. The agriculture
sector in India is highly diverse and it supports the majority of its population
for livelihood. Its contribution in National GDP is approximately 18%. This is
such a vital sector of our economy that without improving its growth, it is not
possible to achieve the desirable level of growth of 9 or 10% of our National
GDP. Most of our farmers are small and marginal farmers and, therefore, suitable
market access for their produce and assurance of remunerative prices to them,
continues to be one of the major challenges being faced in our agricultural system.
Without improving marketing opportunities and competitiveness, it would be difficult
to achieve the targeted 4% annual growth in Agricultural GDP. Thus, viability
of the small holdings is an important issue and promoting agricultural diversification
towards high value crops through an efficient marketing system is considered to
be one of the means through which this can be achieved. In India, the role
of Government has generally remained focused on promoting organized marketing
of agricultural commodities in the country through a network of regulated markets.
To achieve an efficient system of buying and selling of agricultural commodities,
most of the State-Governments and Union Territories have enacted legislations
(APMC Act) to provide for regulation of agricultural produce markets. This gave
a tremendous strength to our agricultural marketing system and the total number
of regulated market yards/ sub-yard which was only 286 in 1950, went up to 7566
by the end of March, 2006. The basic objective of setting up of network of physical
markets has been to ensure reasonable gain to the farmers by creating environment
in markets for fair play of supply and demand forces, regulate market practices
and attain transparency in transactions. Under the APMC Act, only the State
Governments are permitted to set up markets. Monopolistic practices and modalities
of the State-controlled markets have prevented private investment in the sector.
The licensing of traders in the regulated markets has led to the monopoly of the
licensed traders acting as a major entry barrier for a new entrepreneur. The traders,
commission agents and other functionaries organize themselves into associations,
which generally do not allow easy entry of new persons, stifling the very spirit
of competitive functioning. In view of liberalization of trade and emergence
of global markets, it became necessary to promote development of a competitive
marketing infrastructure in the country and to bring about professionalism in
the management of existing market yards and market fee structure. While promoting
the alternative marketing structure, however, Government needs to put in place
adequate safeguards to avoid any exploitation of farmers by the private trade
and industries. For this, there was a need to formulate a Model Legislation on
agricultural marketing. The Ministry of Agriculture had accordingly formulated
a Model Law on agricultural marketing in consultation with the States Governments
in 2003 and circulated to them for adoption. The draft Model Legislation provides
for establishment of Private Markets/ Yards, Direct Purchase Centres, Consumer/Farmers
Markets for direct sale and promotion of Public Private Partnership in the management
and development of agricultural markets in the country. It also provides for Special
Markets for Commodities like Onions, Fruits, Vegetables, Flowers etc. A separate
Chapter has been included in the legislation to regulate and promote contract-farming
arrangements in the country. It provides for prohibition of commisssion agency
in any transaction of agricultural commodities with the producers. It redefines
the role of present Agricultural Produce Market Committee to promote alternative
marketing system, contract farming, direct marketing and farmers/ consumers markets,
it also redefines the role of State Agricultural Marketing Boards to promote standardization,
grading, quality certification, market led extension and training of farmers and
market functionaries in marketing related areas. Provision has also been made
in the Act for constitution of State Agricultural Produce Marketing Standards
Bureau for promotion of Grading, Standardization and Quality Certification of
agricultural produce. This would facilitate pledge financing, E-trading, direct
purchasing, export, forward/future trading and introduction of negotiable warehousing
receipt system in respect of agricultural commodities. Till now, twenty
five States/ UTs have either amended their Act or have no APMC Act. The 53rd meeting
of NDC chaired by the Prime Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh, in its resolution has
advised the States to encourage development of modern markets by completing the
process of amending the APMC Act and notify the Rules thereunder, and also encourage
development of linkages to markets through a variety of instruments including
co-operatives of farmers, contract farming and other means preferred by the States.
The process of notifying Rules under the amended APMC Legislation should be completed
during 2007-08. In pursuance of this resolution, the Ministry of Agriculture has
also framed draft Model Rules for the guidance of States/ UTs and circulated to
them for consultation. A favourable regulatory environment has attracted
the interest of several large corporates of late. While corporate intervention
in upstream agricultural activities was limited to the Agri-input players largely,
the recent times have witnessed a spurt in business initiatives by other industry
players as well. ITC's e-choupal is such an initiative and endeavours to offer
an integrated bundle of services ranging from technical help on agricultural package
and practices, supply of inputs, market information in rural areas, etc. to the
farming community. The impact of such integrated services at grassroot levels
has been very positive and has encouraged even the small firms to divest innovative
models to deliver services and products at the farmers' door steps. The
emergence of direct retailing in recent years and creation of quality retail space
has led to an increased demand for quality produce and thereby investment in supply
chain infrastructure including cold chain. Modern food retailing will offer the
prospect that lower marketing costs could lead to lower prices for consumers and
higher realization for farmers. These economies need to be fully exploited to
increase the income of farmers. The corporate investments in the farming sector
have increased substantially in the recent years and has reached the inflection
point with several large corporate such as ITC, the Tata Group, Adanis and Godrej
etc. ready to make significant investments. The entry of large business conglomerates
such as Reliance Industries is likely to attract more investments and are expected
to create a cascading effect across the SME segment of the food and agri-space. With
the effective implementation of the above reform measures initiated by the Government
of India, agricultural marketing sector is expected to achieve nation wide integration
and thereby enhance the competitiveness of Indian agriculture in global markets.
These measures would also facilitate private sector in making massive investments
for development of agriculture infrastructure and ago-processing industries in
the years to come. Despite several initiatives undertaken by the Central
Government, it is seen that response for market reforms from certain State Governments
is lukewarm. The arrangements of direct marketing and contract farming are being
seen with suspicion by some. The impact of growth of organized retail is being
perceived as a threat by certain sections of the agribusiness sector. While State
Governments have made certain amendments, they have not fully adopted the widely
accepted provisions recommended through the model AMPC Act. Even though Jammu
and Kashmir Government has not notified the marekt areas and commodities, it has
not considered the proposed amendments. Punjab, Haryana and NCT of Delhi have
made only partial amendments in their Acts and the Governments of Uttar Pradesh
and Uttarakhand are yet to consider the proposed amendments. This Conference,
I am sure, would facilitate a debate on the various issues relating to agricultural
marketing and would help evolve considered opinions about the future course of
action in this regard. |