International
Conference on investment Friendly Tax and Corporate Law Regime
November 13 -15, 2003, New Delhi
Welcome Address by Mr Onkar S Kanwar, Vice
President, FICCI
I have great pleasure in extending to you all a very warm
and cordial welcome to this International Conference. I am
particularly grateful to Mr R R Shah, Secretary, Department
of Industrial Policy and Promotion, Ministry of Industry for
kindly agreeing to inaugurate the Conference inspite of other
compelling demands on his time. His observations will give
a constructive start to our deliberations.
To begin with, I express our sincere thanks to the officials
of the Ministry of Finance and Ministry of Industry. Their
participation in the discussion bears out the fact that there
is no substitute for a free and frank exchange of views and
opinions on a common platform. Today, we have a gathering
of persons with diversified backgrounds, experience and expertise,
and as such, we can with confidence look forward to stimulating
and constructive discussions.
FICCI has organized this Conference in association with Organisation
for Economic Cooperation and Development, International Bureau
of Fiscal Documentation and European Commission. This is third
Conference in the series. I would like to thank all the three
organisations that have joined FICCI in organizing this mega
event. All of you would agree with me that without their support,
it would not have been possible for us to organize this Conference
in such a major way.
Friends, all of you are aware that since 1991 India has undergone
a sea change in its outlook towards foreign investment and
global collaboration. The Tenth Five Year Plan marks the return
of visionary planning to India after a long interregnum of
cautious optimism. During the past two decades, India has,
no doubt, been one of the ten fastest growing economies in
the world, but we cannot be content with that.
The Hon'ble Prime Minister of India has set the stage for
formulation of the Tenth Five Year Plan by indicating a vision
in which the per capita income is to be doubled within the
next ten years. The Prime Minister has also perceived a goal
of creating 100 million employment opportunities over the
next ten years.
To achieve the much-desired acceleration in economic and
industrial growth, it is imperative that our industry must
be competitive. The idea of this Conference is to understand
the various dimensions and concepts of competitiveness. The
moot question for consideration is as to whether the Indian
industry is really competitive? Considering this aspect in
mind, we thought that the theme of this Conference should
be "India's Competitiveness as a Business Destination".
In order to make the Indian industry competitive, a number
of initiatives have been taken by the Government over the
last five years and more particularly in the recent past.
The economic and fiscal statutes have been re-structured and
are now comparable with other countries of the world.
No doubt, due to reforms initiated in the recent past, India's
position in the global economy has improved from the eighth
position in 1991 to the fourth place in 2001 when the gross
domestic product is calculated on a Purchasing Power Parity
basis. The perception about India as a destination of international
investment is fast improving. This is supported by recent
development, which has helped the country record a positive
growth in Foreign Direct Investment last year, when globally
FDI had negative growth.
It is also important to note that during the 90s, India had
the third largest average annual growth rate of 5.6 per cent
amongst the major developing countries. Only China and Korea
had higher growth rates than India during this period.
In developing countries like India, FDI is seen as a means
to supplement domestic investment for achieving a higher level
of economic growth. FDI benefits the domestic industry as
well as the consumers by providing opportunities for technological
upgradation, access to global managerial skills and practices,
optimal utilization of human and natural resources, opening
up export markets and access to international quality goods
and services.
India has the potential to attract as much as $100 billion
Foreign Direct Investment over the next five years. From the
same, the domestic and export sector has the potential to
attract $45 billion and $10 billion respectively. However,
FDI inflows depend upon a number of factors like the assurance
of safe recovery of capital, regular repatriation of dividends,
overall sound economic climate, exchange rate and price stability,
availability of raw material and other inputs like skilled
manpower, infrastructure facilities etc.
Today, not every entrepreneur is willing to deal with multiplicity
of local taxes and this positively discourages investments.
There is also a need to increase the contribution of the services
sector to taxes in line with the increased share of services
in our GDP. Under pressure to reduce deficit and raise tax
revenues and our inability to tax agricultural income, the
burden has fallen disproportionately on tax revenues from
incomes generated mainly by the industrial sector. This distortion
lies at the root of the low tax GDP ratio for India and this
needs to be seriously addressed. Such a situation, prima-facie,
leads to inequity in income taxation.
Let me also take this opportunity to say few words about
the India's legal system and Corporate Governance practices
and the developments, which have taken place in the recent
past in this area. India's legal and judicial system are highly
sophisticated and well developed. India is also fortunate
that it's judiciary is manned by highly qualified and learned
judges. Also, there are enough laws to safeguard the rights
of people and provide justice to them.
In spite of the same, India's legal and judicial system has
not kept pace with the changing needs. Ever increasing population,
increase in number of laws, increase in the industrial activities
and other changes are resulting in inordinate delays in disposal
of cases.
We all know, Corporate Governance is an essential pre-requisite
for wealth creation. Wealth itself has a cyclical tendency
to rise and fall, like a Charka, a Wheel, in a competitive
market. The amplitudes can be reduced by good Corporate Governance.
Corporate Governance is determined not by competence, but
by dharma, ethics.
FICCI feels that "the route to better Corporate Governance
does not entail in a complicated rule based approach and any
rule making will not go a long way in improving the ground
realities and enriching the ethical dimension of Corporate
Governance. FICCI is of the view that the Corporate Governance
should not be mandatory and cannot be enforced by legislation.
To make the Indian economy more conducive both for domestic
and foreign investment, the Government need to consider the
following suggestions:
First, there is a need to instill some basic essential attributes
in the tax system. These include simplicity, stability, equity,
efficiency, neutrality, flexibility, progressivity, acceptability
and revenue elasticity etc.
Second, world over, taxation has gained acceptance from tax
economists and policy makers and is viewed not only as a resource
generation mechanism but also as a tool for enabling social
and economic development. Tax planning and policy making helps
reforming socio economic status of a country by focusing at
(i) industrial growth; (ii) encouraging export promotion and
import substitution; (iii) promoting inflow of foreign investment
and (iv) providing additional employment through provision
of suitable fiscal incentives. For this, it is important that
the country should have a Long Term Fiscal Policy at least
for five years focusing on these aspects.
Third, FICCI for a long has been advocating that much desired
incentives should be provided in the tax laws to stimulate
investment. This is all the more necessary as increased investment
in the core sector in India is the key to industrial growth.
The restoration of investment allowance / development rebate
needs to be thought about. Simultaneously, the Minimum Alternative
Tax which has adversely affected the internal resource generation
of the companies resulting in a severe blow to their plans
of expansion and diversification needs to be withdrawn.
Fourth, as a matter of principle, there should not be any
tax on dividend distribution as we have presently in place.
World over, the countries are moving towards abolishing the
tax on dividend income both in the hands of corporate and
shareholders.
Fifth, the amendment in the definition of "Resident
but Not Ordinary Resident" will have major negative effects.
It is not clear as to when the Indian Government is taking
various measures to attract NRI investment, why such an amendment
is needed in the Income Tax Law. It would be in fitness of
things that status quo ante should be restored in regard to
the definition of "Not Ordinary Resident" and the
law should be amended to do away with the interpretation given
by Gujarat High Court to this phrase.
Sixth, there is an urgent need for a massive cut in commodity
taxes on demand elastic items to stimulate demand in the economy.
Tax cuts would provide the urgently needed boost to India's
manufacturing sector. Further, we also need to see as to whether
we should reduce our peak tariff to 20 per cent in another
two years to reach at the ASEAN level. We in FICCI feel that
unless and until the glaring problems concerning labour, infrastructure,
transaction cost, power, interest, taxes and duties and small-scale
reservation are addressed pragmatically, there should not
be any general reduction in customs duty structure as the
same would seriously affect our economy and industrial growth.
Sir, in nutshell, efforts will have to be made to give the
much-needed thrust to the economy not by lit bits but in a
major way. We in FICCI do believe that investment by Government
must be focused in areas, which are very much relevant for
the acceleration of the growth augmenting sectors and should
be used not for the objective of achieving ownership but for
leveraging private sector participation also in the same sectors.
Thus, the total capital, which is attracted to the concerned
sectors, would be significantly greater than what the Government
puts up by itself.
To my mind, a uniform taxation policy for different sectors,
irrespective of the widely differing impact on enhancement
of social security, capital formation, employment creation
and earning of foreign exchange appears inappropriate atleast
till the time country reaches key milestones in terms of economic
growth, overall global competitiveness and increase in per
capita income. Once these milestones are reached and national
priorities met, the framework can certainly be reviewed and
modified to be in line with the then prevailing needs of the
economy.
Seventh, it is important that we should review our various
economic legislations and make them more industry and consumer
friendly. To illustrate a few - Companies Act, 1956, Prevention
of Money Laundering Act, Securitisation Act, Competition Act,
etc. There is also a need to review the Takeover Code and
the Regulations pertaining to insider trading.
FICCI welcomes the withdrawal of the Companies (Amendment)
Bill, 2003 and recommends the automatic withdrawal of Clause
49 of the Listing Agreement. It is important that the scope
of the Regulator should be limited to the extent of framing
regulations. The Regulators should not exceed its boundaries
and, at best, provide broad guidelines, framework and regulations
for the corporate sector.
With this background in mind, the three-day Conference would
focus on topics such as Development of Investment Friendly
Taxation Regime, Direction of India's Tax Reforms, Cross Border
Investment and Tax Treaties, Transfer Pricing and E-Commerce,
Value Added Tax, Reforms in Customs and Central Excise, Corporate
Governance and Emerging Issues in Corporate Laws.
I have confined myself to some important general issues,
which I believe, are inter related and relevant to the discussion
on the specific items on the Agenda.
Thank you.
|