|
"Cityscapes 2002"
Global Convention on Agenda for Urban Infrastructure
Reforms
October 21-22, 2002, New Delhi
Presidential Address by Shri O Rajagopal,
Minister of State for Urban Development & Poverty
Alleviation
Honourable Minister of Urban Development and Poverty
Alleviation Shri Ananth Kumarji; Mr Len Duvall
OBE, Chairperson, CLGF; Shri Rajendra S. Lodha, President,
FICCI; Dr. Amit Mitra, Secretary General – FICCI; Shri
Niranjan Hiranandani, Chairman, Housing & Public
Works Committee; Secretary (Urban Development); Distinguished
delegates and friends; Ladies and Gentlemen. It
is my proud privilege to be here in this august gathering
and extend a warm welcome to all of you.
Rapid growth of population and its concentration in
cities around the world are affecting the long term
outlook for humanity. Despite 4 millennia, as
Centres of civilization and economic activities, cities
never attracted more than a few per cent of the global
population until the last century. Now at the
beginning of the 21st century, system of cities has
become a dominant factor in the world’s socio-economic
cultural and political matrix.
Burdened with all the problems of growth, cities are
increasingly subject to dramatic crisis, especially
in developing countries. Unemployment, environmental
degradation, lack of urban services, deterioration of
existing infrastructure and the lack of access to land,
finance and adequate shelter are among the main areas
of concern.
India is a part of the global trend towards increasing
urbanization in which more than half of world’s population
is living in cities and towns. As per 2001 census
285 million of India’s population lives in urban areas
making it the second largest urban system in the world.
However, the unplanned and uncontrolled rapid growth
in our urban areas has serious negative effects on urban
dwellers and their environment. The provision
of infrastructure facilities and services, required
to support large concentrations of population, is lagging
far behind the pace of urbansiation. Most of the
cities and towns in the country have serious shortage
of power, water supply, sewerage, developed land, housing,
transportation, communication and other civic facilities.
Large proportions of urban population, particularly
in metropolitan cities, are far below the poverty line.
This has resulted in proliferation of slums, growth
of the informal sector, lack of educational facilities
and deteriorating health level to a large section of
urban inhabitants. The legal and administrative
system concerning urban planning, governance and management
need to address these issues.
The major urban concern is the growing gap between
demand and supply of basic civic amenities. In
fact, increased urbanization is accompanied by severe
environmental problems which adversely affect the quality
of life of the people living in urban areas. While
problems have been increasing, both in magnitude and
complexity, the resource allocation has been going down.
The urban areas in the country being the centres of
production of goods and services have acquired an important
role in the globalization regime. Augmentation
of basic services and urban infrastructure to improve
the quality of life of urban inhabitants as well as
to facilitate economic growth requires huge investment
of funds. Though municipal finances shall have
to be self-supportive, they are presently too fragile
to meet the increasing demand for resources emanating
from the process of urbanization and economic development.
Therefore, innovative strategies are required to be
developed by the Urban Local Bodies to reduce the mis-match
between its functions and sources of revenue.
Enhancing the productivity of urban areas is now central
to the policy pronouncement of the Ministry of Urban
Development & Poverty Alleviation. For Indian
cities to become growth oriented and productive, it
is essential to achieve a world class urban system,
which in turn would depend on attaining efficiency and
equity in the delivery and financing of urban infrastructure.
In recent years, the Central Government has provided
several fiscal incentives to help mobilization of resources
for urban infrastructure. These include permitting
the issuance of Tax Free Municipal Bonds, broadening
the definition of infrastructure to include urban infrastructure
such as water supply and sanitation, removing restrictions
on Foreign Direct Investment in urban infrastructure
and encouraging externally assisted urban sector projects
and Public Private Partnership. Although these
initiatives are in right direction still many more such
steps are needed for giving pace to the urban reform
process.
I strongly hope that the deliberations during the Convention
would lay the foundation for developing a critical understanding
of meeting the challenges in the field of urban infrastructure.
I wish the Convention all success.
JAI HIND
|