|
"India's
Tax Competitiveness" - International Conference
on Taxation Policy for Accelerating Investment : Domestic
and Foreign
November 13-14 2002, New Delhi
Welcome Address by Mr R S Lodha,
President, FICCI
I have great pleasure in extending to you all a very
cordial welcome to this International Conference.
I am particularly grateful to Dr S Narayan, Finance
Secretary for kindly agreeing to inaugurate the Conference
inspite of other compelling demands on his time.
His observations will give a constructive lead to our
deliberations. I am also thankful to Shri Anil
Ambani, Vice Chairman, Reliance Industries Ltd. for
accepting our request to deliver the Key-Note Address.
To begin with, I would express our sincere thanks to
the officials of the Ministry of Finance and Company
Affairs. Their participation in the discussion
bears out the fact that there is no substitute for a
free and frank exchange of views and opinions on a common
platform. I am also thankful to the delegates
for attending the Conference. Today, we have a
galaxy of participants both from India and abroad.
FICCI has organized this Conference in association
with the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development,
the International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation and
the European Commission. I would like to thank
all the Organisations for joining FICCI in organizing
this Mega Event. All of you would agree with me
that without their support, it would not have been possible
for us to organize this Conference in such a major way.
Sir, the liberalized economic policies announced over
the past few years were a major landmark in India's
efforts to accelerate industrialization and progressively
integrate the Indian economy with the global economy.
The new economic policies were intended to restructure
and rejuvenate trade and industry and initiate vigorous
structural reforms in the monetary and fiscal sectors.
Sir, within a short span, the Finance Ministry has
taken a number of measures to kick start the economy
and send positive signals to create confidence in the
economy. The Finance Minister has constituted
two Task Forces on Direct and Indirect Taxes under the
Chairmanship of Dr Vijay Kelkar - the leading economist
and his Advisor in the Ministry of Finance and Company
Affairs. We are indeed happy that the Task Forces
have submitted their Report within the given timeframe
and put the same on web, inviting views from corporate
sector, professionals and public at large.
Sir, the Finance Minister has also laid down the Road
Map for the forthcoming Union Budget. We in FICCI
are indeed happy that he would give top most priority
to economic reforms including taxation in a bid to push
growth and contain fiscal deficit.
We in FICCI believe that the overall thrust of our
reforms should be on : (i) Measures to stimulate demand;
(ii) Measures for encouraging private investment and
capital formation; (iii) Reduction in taxes to encourage
consumer spending; (iv) Cheap availability of development
finance; (v) Legal changes to stimulate entrepreneurship;
and (vi) Transparency in governance.
I feel I owe an explanation to all of you on why we
have chosen the theme for the Conference as India's
Tax Competitiveness and organized this International
Conference on Taxation Policy for Accelerating Investment
: Domestic and Foreign.
I take this opportunity to inform all of you that this
is the Platinum Jubilee Year of FICCI. This is
a historic moment for all of us. We have chosen
the theme for this year - India Unbound : Accelerating
Growth through Competitiveness with Confidence.
With this theme for the year, we thought that it would
be appropriate if we discuss tax related issues, which
have a direct bearing on competitiveness.
The World Economic Forum has recently published its
Global Competitiveness Report for the year 2000.
The Report places India at 37th position against China's
44th in the current competitive index.
The current challenge for the Indian corporates is to
see as to how to become more and more competitive.
Let me highlight two key factors closely related with
Competitiveness. To my mind, the first factor
is internal in nature and the second is external one.
Indian industries are deeply engaged in internal restructuring
of business at a radical pace. As a result, there
is a spate of mergers, amalgamations, de-mergers and
takeovers. The external milieu lies in the hands
of Government. The external dimensions of being
globally competitive, what I call the LITPITS effect
i.e. labour, infrastructure, transaction costs, power,
interest, taxes and duties and small scale reservations
are being tackled at the root.
In India, the cascading effect of customs, excise,
sales tax and other local levies results in the consumption
tax of over 35% of the final price to the consumer,
double that in U.K. - 17.5%. FICCI has recently
conducted a study to know the total incidence of Indirect
Taxes as a proportion of selling price. The study
reveals that the average total incidence on selling
price in case of consumer goods is 44.11% capital goods
43.26%, basic goods 30.28% and intermediate goods 30.06%.
Sir, during a meeting organized by FICCI at Mumbai,
H.E. Zhu Rongji, the Premier of People's Republic of
China stated as under : To quote
"I asked some members of my delegation, to go out
to visit some of
your shops of household electronics. They came
back and said that
these products are sold at a price 3-6 times higher
than Chinese price".
Sir, to become more competitive and rather globally
competitive, I would like to submit the following points
for consideration:
First, Sir, we are happy that the Government is keen
to introduce Value Added Tax from 1st April,
2003. VAT system of taxation is considered to
be superior to other systems of taxation as it avoids
/ reduces cascading effect of Indirect Taxes. VAT system
must be used as a catalyst for growth from the first
day itself. It is important that while moving
towards VAT, the concerns of the corporates, various
States and consumers at large must be taken into consideration
so that we have industry and consumer friendly VAT system
in place. What is important is that all states
including the new States of Jharkhand, Uttaranchal,
Chhatishgarh and many Union Territories must come out
with Draft Bills and Rules for public debate and discussion.
Since the system is new, the Government must give training
and orientation to their staff as well as the corporates
and traders so that they can understand the implications
of the same in advance.
Second, there is an urgent need for a massive cut in
commodity taxes on demand elastic items to stimulate
demand in the economy. Tax cuts would provide
the urgently needed boost to India's manufacturing sector.
The concept of Special Excise Duty (SED) should be done
away with.
Third, we also need to see as to whether we should
reduce our peak tariff to 20% in another 2-3 years to
reach at the ASEAN level. The Task Force on Indirect
Taxes, in its reports has also suggested a Road Map
in respect of Custom Duties so that there is no uncertainty
in the minds of investors and industry. The task
Force has suggested that Duty should be 10% for raw
materials, inputs and intermediate goods and 20% for
final goods.
Sir, we in FICCI feel that unless and until disabilities,
which I pointed out earlier, are addressed properly,
there should not be any general reduction in customs
duty structure. What is important is that in the meantime,
the anomalies in the duty structure should be removed.
It is important that we should have a three-tier duty
structure - lowest on raw materials, slightly higher
on intermediaries and highest on finished products.
Fourth, a comparison of corporate tax rate shows that
still the tax rate on India Inc is on the higher side
and should be reduced to 30%. Sir, N K Singh Committee
has also advocated for corporate tax rate of 30%.
There is also a need to give the much-needed incentives
to replace plant and machinery, which have become outdated
due to change in technology. The Government may consider
restoring investment allowance for the same. Worldwide,
taxation policies have been used to stimulate investments.
Countries like Canada, France, germany, Japan, USA,
U.K. etc. provide for Investment Allowance / Accelerated
Depreciation Allowance, Carry Back of Depreciation,
Tax Holidays etc. to stimulate investments. The South
East Asian countries also provide incentives to stimulate
capital investment in their country.
MAT has adversely affected the internal resource generation
of the companies resulting in a severe blow to their
plans of expansion and diversification. Sir, what MAT
does is to narrow the picture confining it only to the
direct tax contribution, and consequently distorting
the overall picture.
Sir, the Task Force on Direct Taxes has recently made
the consultation paper containing its recommendations
public for debate and discussion. We in FICCI
are in the process of soliciting views from our members
on the same.
Fifth, How to restructure corporate sector through
economies of scale? Though, the government has taken
a number of
measures in the last 2 to 3 years, but these are not
adequate. Time and again, FICCI had drawn their attention
to the hurdles,
which are coming in the way of mergers, de-mergers and
amalgamations and they need to be addressed at the earliest.
I would like to highlight a few of these hurdles, which
are upper most in my mind. First, incentives provided
for Corporate
Restructuring is negated by the excessive stamp duty.
The rate of stamp duty varies between 10 to 15% of the
current
market value of the fixed assets. State Governments
should be persuaded to reduce the stamp duty and the
same made
applicable uniformly for all States. Second, demergers
be also made possible under section 293(1)(a) of the
Companies Act
1956 in addition to Sections 391 to 394 route. Further,
amalgamated company should be allowed to retain only
50% and not
3/4th of the value of the assets of the amalgamating
company to facilitate prudent utilization of remaining
assets of
amalgamating company.
Sir, what is important is that exemption needs to be
given for change in shareholding pursuant to mergers/demergers
on lines
similar to those existing under Section 80IB (12) whereby
the benefit is continued in the hands of the amalgamated
or the
resultant company. This will go towards facilitating
business reorganization, spin offs, etc. as well as
permit variation in
shareholding.
Sixth, We are of the view that a fresh look is required
as some of the treaties have become the subject matter
of discussion
in the recent past. It is imperative that our tax treaties
especially those which are outmoded in the context of
changing
scenario be suitably revised and rationalized. While
doing so, it should be ensured that misuse of tax treaties
is adequately
checked.
Before I conclude, we are confident that your deep
understanding of the economic changes at global level
will help in providing
further impetus to the economic reform programme and
pave the way for second generation reforms in the country
in our
relentless journey towards becoming a super power. I
am confident that the suggestions, submitted by FICCI
from time to
time, will be duly considered by you and your Officials
appropriately. We would shortly send you the key recommendations
of
the Conference for your kind consideration.
Thank you
|