India Chem 2000
October 6-8,2000
Water Conservation
Mr. Sidney Dunn,
Technical Director- Asia Pacific,
Betz Dearborn.
I am honored to be invited here to
India Chem 2000 Conference.
I have been visiting India for almost
5 years traveling to the many corners of this fascinating
country. In no way would I consider myself an expert,
I am but a curious and somewhat knowledgeable observer.
In that short time, I have seen very significant development,
growth and opening of the Indian Economy to foreign
investment and products. At the same time we are seeing
the impact of the India throughout the world, as Indian's
are moving out into the world economy developing businesses
and becoming the CEO's of many international companies.
The statistics that I have seen, indicated
that the Chemical Sector is growing at 12% and the Industrial
Sector at 6-8%. This growth is in many areas,
in the "Old Style" heavy industries such as Power Generation,
Refining and Petrochemical, as well as the "New Age",
high tech industries of the IT World. This is a tremendous
accomplishment. My congratulations to all of you for
being a part of this growth. But there is still much
to do.
In my opinion, the KEY COMPONENT
of growth and development is WATER;
- It's availability
- Use and
- Protection.
Without clean water, industry cannot grow and civilization
cannot survive. Water must be considered as THE FEED
STOCK for this growth. Just as crude oil is the feed
stock for a refinery or iron ore feeds a steel mill. Clean,
available water is the feed stock for industry
and industrial growth.
As countries develop World Class Industrial
Sectors, they must adopt World Class Water and Environmental
Standards.
Water must be;
Properly valued,
Conserved,
Reused and
When discharged upgraded to the highest standards.
In our world today, the water that is discharged from
one facility is the makeup water to another industry or
it becomes the bathing and drinking water for the people
downstream
It is important that India benefit
from the lessons learned by the United States, Europe
and other countries right here in Asia. All too often
environmental standards were and are compromised in
the interest of economic development.
I am not sure how familiar you are
with the Southern US in particular Louisiana, and the
Mississippi River. The Mississippi River runs from the
Canadian Border to the Gulf of Mexico. It has been the
major waterway that facilitated the development of the
central part of our country, from New Orleans north.
During and after world War II, the stretch of river
from Baton Rouge Louisiana to New Orleans developed
into one of the major refining and petrochemical centers
in our country due to the availability of natural resources
and inexpensive river transportation. If you have never
seen it, it is hard to imagine the number of refineries
and chemical plants in that short 150-km stretch of
river from Baton Rouge to New Orleans. Every one of
them is dependent on that river for makeup water and
to have a place to discharge their wastewater. At the
same time this industrial development was taking place
the entire upper Mississippi continued to grow as people
populated the midwest.
I grew up in Louisiana, a state that
was famous for it's wild life and culture. It also became
known for the refineries, the chemical plants, and more
infamously the pollution— Pollution of our rivers
and our land. Sadly, much of this was due lack of technology,
but also to people, companies, and to some extent regulatory
agencies turning a blind eye to environmental compliance
in the interest of economic development. In all fairness,
when much of the industrial development was taking place
(in the 1930's to the 60's) environmental management
and protection was an developing science. Many people
felt that the Mississippi River was a bottomless pit
and could absorb anything that was thrown into it with
no problem. As we all came to know that was not true.
Having grown up in Baton Rouge and
New Orleans I am well aware of what we called the Chicken
Coop Effect. Living in the lower Mississippi River
Basin is like being on the bottom shelf of a chicken
coop. You get all the STUFF (if you know what
I mean) from everyone above you.
Depending on the size of the coop and
the number of chickens over your head, it can get very
STUFFY. And Baton Rouge/New Orleans are on the
bottom of a VERY LARGE CHICKEN COOP—
You really learn to appreciate the
chickens on the top rack that are considerate of the
ones on the lower rack. So please avoid the CHICKEN
COOP EFFECT here.
Throughout the world, water is in short
supply due to
- droughts,
- expanding populations,
- industrial demand, and
- pollution which is reducing the usability
of water resources.
Many countries and companies are taking steps to address
these problems by recycling and reusing water/-
Right here in India a number of very
significant water recycle plants have been built. One
is in Manali south of Chennai where secondary treated
municipal effluent is sent to a teritiary treatment
system, cleanedup, and reused as industrial water. A
major World Scale Refinery on the western coast is recycling
the effluent water to their cooling towers. These types
of projects are demonstrating to the rest of the world
how water can be cleaned up and recycled. An added benefit
of these projects is that people involved, in the projects
are moving out into Asia sharing their knowledge and
expertise, representing India..
Singapore is another country that is
deeply impacted by a lack of water supply. Singapore's
Economic Development Board is driving the new development
of both heavy industry, and the high tech semiconductor
industry in Singapore. Both industries require large
quantities of water.
Singapore imports the vast majority
of its domestic and industrial water from Malaysia.
This is a strategic concern for Singapore. To address
this, Singapore and the industries there have initiated
a number of projects that are addressing this problem,
- First is a recycle facility using Reverse Osmosis
Membranes to upgrade municipal waste water for industrial
water use and,
- Another similar experimental facility that is converting
municipal wastewater into drinking water.
One last example in Asia —- a refinery in South Korea
had to install a system to recycle it's own industrial
wastewater when they expanded the refinery. There simply
was not enough fresh water to operate the expansion.
This project involved the use of the EDR Process on
their treated waste water.
These types of projects are what are
needed throughout the world, to help protect our available
water resources.
Each one of these projects is taking
wastewater that was or is being discharged to the environment
and reprocessing it or recycling it. For all of these
projects to work, the waste treatment facility that
is in front of that treatment plant must operate reliability
and produce the highest quality water. This is what
I would like to address—the operation of these waste
treatment facilities.
Over the last 10 years I have completed
numerous water management audits throughout the United
States and Asia. A key part of each of these audits
is the waste treatment plant. One common problem I see
is that the waste treatment plants are often not performing
up to specification or producing the best quality water
possible.
Problems develop because of:
- Process expansions of the parent site without taking
into consideration the waste treatment plant,
- Poor maintenance,
- Insufficient technical support and
- Poorly trained operating personnel. Not poor quality
people but just poorly trained and equipped to do
the job at hand.
All of these problems can be corrected if the company
or plant management puts emphasis on the waste treatment
plant and the quality of it's product, the waste water.-
The question is how do we do this?
The water and wastewater treatment
plants must be given the highest priority in three key
areas. The three areas are:
- Management
- Operation-
- Technical support
The first item-- Management - In my opinion
the waste treatment plant management and operations positions
must be at the same status in the plant organization as
any other processing units such as the Crude Unit or the
Reformer in a Refinery, or the Blast Furnace in a Steel
Mill
When a Refinery Vice President walks
into his office in the morning, the first question that
he typically asks is how much oil did we process
yesterday?
I think the second question
should be
"How good is our wastewater?" Is
it better quality than the environmental limits? If
not why not and when will it be corrected?
If we get to this point, then we will
be doing a good job of protection our environment and
insuring the future of our growth.
Second, Operation - the
expertise of the operating personnel has to be of the
highest quality- as good as or better than you would
want in your most profitable processing area. the waste
treatment plant is not performing, there may be no place
to put the waste from the processing units so they have
to shutdown so doesn't it make sense to value the waste
treatment operation?.
Third-- Technical Support
- this applies to internal support from the engineering
departments and laboratories as well as support from
outside the company. From suppliers and consultants.
The waste treatment plant should be in a prestigeous
position. Industry would do well to establish partnerships
with supply companies that can help them understand
their systems and operate their waste treatment plants.
Proper waste treatment plant operation can be a difficult
process that many companies are not prepared to address
or staff up for. Whereas there are companies that do
have the capabilities to do this type of work in many
different configurations. This configuration can take
many forms, which many of you are probably aware of.
These business arrangements can range from a company
acting purely as a consultant, to actually taking over
the waste treatment plant operation, If the water is
reused it can then be sold back as a product.
One final area that I would like to
see changes, made is in the approach that governmental
agencies take in administering effluent limits.
Typically the effluent limits are set
by an environmental regulatory agency such as the EPA,
using their own standards or the standards set in the
USA or Europe. If you meet the limit you are OK. If
you do not you pay a fine and then go on about your
business. Sometimes these limits are good and help protect
the receiving body of water, sometimes they are too
lenient or are ineffective. This to me is not a positive
approach to environmental management. There is no incentive
for companies to exceed the limits or to produce better
water than is required. Their job is to meet the limits.
From the Plant Operation standpoint,
this process is purely economical. As a effluent generator,
I will do no more that is necessary. If I spend more
money on my waste plant and produce higher quality water
going to the outfall than my permit and/or my competitor
it will hurt my costs structure relative to his and
it will affect my bottom line and potential to sell
my product. Therefore my approach is to only meet the
limits set by the Environmental Regulatory Group.
What I would like to see is an incentive
plan where companies that continually improve their
effluent water quality are given some form of credits,
either economic or tax or whatever which could be used
to upgrade the water systems or their even their processes
to reduce waste generation and water use.
Additionally, I would like to see a
system where positive publicity statements are issued
by the government to the public acknowledging the work
and the efforts of the ecologically responcible or aggressive
companies and the employees. This requires some manner
of communications from the Environmental Agencies to
the public to educate them as to how the companies are
performing in the area.
All Companies thrive on good Publicity
and suffer from bad Publicity. Under these conditions,
there would be an incentive to do better than what is
legislated and the water supplies would be cleaner.
Our company has an award that we call
the "ROE" or "Return On the Environment"
Award . This award is given to a very select
few of our customers. The ROE Award is presented to
our customers who while working in partnership with
our representatives are are able to document one or
more of the following:
- A significant reduction in their environmental
impact in quantity or an improvement in the quality
of discharges,
- A significant reduction in water use and or discharge
- A significant reduction in operating costs
The award is 35-cm Crystal Globe that is presented our
Vice President of Asia Pacific to the Customer's President
or
CEO. Typically the globe is placed in the corporate headquarters
showcase or at the winning site. The local media including
both newspaper and television cover the award presentation.
In addition announcements are placed in Fortune Magazine
and in industry related publications in the region.
There have been two Winners of the
ROE award in Asia Pacific, Tata Steel, in Jamshedpur
in 1998 and Methanex Methanol in New Zealand in 2000.
This is one small step we have taken to recognize and
encourage industry to reduce their environmental impact.
In Summary-
- Water is THE KEY raw material or feed stock
for industrial growth in any country and certainly
in India. The availability of clean water will promote
the development of a World Class Industrial Sector.
- The development of a World Class Industrial Sector
requires and demands the application of World Class
Environmental Standards-
- Water is in very short supply in India and many
parts of this world, and as such, must be properly
valued, and conserved, for if a country wishes to
have a world class industrial sector it must have
world class environmental standards-
- Please avoid the Chicken Coop Effect in your country,
and work at reducing the impact of the Chicken Coop
Effect
- Waste treatment plants are the key to our future
and must be operated as if our future depends on them,
because it does?
- Waste treatment plants must be given top priority
in the form of management, operation and technical
support within all companies.
- And finally, I would like to see a governmental
body develop an environmental policy that gives incentives
to companies to produce better quality water than
is required at the same time constantly raising the
quality of water allowed—in other words working together
with the producers to improve the quality of the water.
Again, thanks to India Chem 2000, to Dr. D. K. Biswas,
facilitating this meeting, to all of the companies that
have put up displays, and to you the participants for
attending and making this a great inaugural meeting.
Next Mr. Venkatesh will present a specific
case history on water recycle.
|